This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 branch: boehm-gc does not work on s390-linux
- To: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 branch: boehm-gc does not work on s390-linux
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:39:15 +0200
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, hans_boehm at hp dot com,"Hartmut Penner" <HPENNER at de dot ibm dot com>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- References: <OF359B9BDD.31DA6379-ONC1256AA7.004A0832@de.ibm.com>
"Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>>I noticed that the trunk has a newer version of boehm-gc that's ported
>>for S390. Since I don't think we can do a merge of boehm-gc to the
>>release branch now, we should leave it the way it is.
>>
>>Hartmut, Ulrich, can you please tell the status of Java on the GCC 3.0
>>branch? Is it supported for S390?
>>
>>Should we disable gcj completly - or just the broken parts? I'll
>>continue testing, and will come up with a tested (!) patch later,
>
> I would suggest to disable gcj completely on the branch, there's simply
> too many parts that don't work yet. It doesn't make much sense IMO to
> have a partially working gcj in the release -- this will just confuse
> people.
>
> However, I'm not familiar enough with the top-level configury to decide
> what's the best way to disable gcj; do you have a suggestion?
The patch I've send does already disable libgcj completly. It just
waits for a final review from Alexandre,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj