This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bug in propagate_one_insn
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: bug in propagate_one_insn
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 12:45:45 -0400
- cc: law at redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010801112007.0246c088@mail.lauterbach.com>
--On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:24 AM +0200 Franz Sirl
<Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-03/msg01335.html
No, but i did notice that the reason propagate_one_insn doesn't crash the
mainline often is because we actually end up deciding the moved libcall
argument sets are dead, and remove them.
What's the relation?
This should actually be *helping* your testcase (Whether it's correct code
or not, i'm not sure).
So this is certainly confusing.
--Dan