This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0

To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis at latnet dot lv>
Subject: Re: --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 17:36:15 -0300
Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>, Ryszard Kabatek <Ryszard dot Kabatek at softax dot pl>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <3B4C3CEC.A065CE56@softax.pl> <20010711144306.A27202@alinoe.com><20010711144453.A18990@disaster.jaj.com><200107120615.f6C6Fsg04195@hal.astr.lu.lv>

On Jul 12, 2001, Andris Pavenis <pavenis@latnet.lv> wrote:

> -  if test x"$enable_c99" = x"no"; then
> +  if ! test x"$ac_c99_stdlib" = x"yes"; then

This is wrong.  Negating the result of a pipeline is a bash-specific
thing, that doesn't belong in portable shell code.

Use test ... != ... instead.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0
  - From: Ryszard Kabatek
- Re: --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: --enable-long-long not recognized by gcc-3.0
  - From: Andris Pavenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]