This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.0 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Regression: c_math.cc Now Fails
- To: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
- Subject: Re: 3.0 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Regression: c_math.cc Now Fails
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 27 May 2001 11:04:49 +0200
- Cc: Jeffrey Oldham <oldham at codesourcery dot com>, gdr at codesourcery dot com, aj at suse dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200105262201.PAA18410@oz.codesourcery.com> <20010527025316.A27095@alinoe.com>
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> writes:
| On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:01:17PM -0700, Jeffrey Oldham wrote:
| >
| > gcc 3.0 for sparc-sun-solaris2.8 now fails on
| > libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/c_math.cc:
| >
| > === libstdc++-v3 tests ===
| > Running target unix
| > FAIL: 26_numerics/c_math.cc (test for excess errors)
| >
| > It did not fail yesterday (25May).
| >
| > Would someone with access to a sparc-sun-solaris2.8 computer please
| > find the offending patch that caused this?
That may be caused by a patch I checked in yesterday which revealed a
latent bug.
| > Under Mark Mitchell's directive
| > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-05/msg01044.html) any patch that
| > causes a regression will be summarily reverted. Once you find the
| > patch, you are empowered to revert it. I can do the dirty work if
| > desired.
|
| This could be the problem with sqrt I saw today on the list?
| In that case it was also already fixed today.
| The subject of the mail with the patch was something like:
| V3 PATCH: #undef abs ...
| I suppose the 'abs' was a typo, it should have been #undef sqrt ;)
Definitely.
Thanks,
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com