This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c++/2494: Template Specialization Name Lookup
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: c++/2494: Template Specialization Name Lookup
- From: landry at physics dot utah dot edu
- Date: 5 Apr 2001 19:00:09 -0000
- Reply-To: landry at physics dot utah dot edu
>Number: 2494
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: Template Specialization Name Lookup
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 05 12:06:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Walter Landry
>Release: gcc 2.95.2 and Codesourcery's nightly
>Organization:
>Environment:
Debian 2.2 (potato)
>Description:
gcc can't seem to generate the specialization in the example
code. It gives the error
simple.C: In function `int main()':
simple.C:25: no match for call to `(Tensor1<double>) (Index<'i'> &)'
KCC version 3.4 and IBM's Visual Age C++ v5.0 both compile
without complaints, so I'm reasonably sure that this is
allowed by the language.
If I get rid of either of the template<>'s, i.e. change
template <class T>
class Tensor1
to
class Tensor1
or change
template<char i>
double operator()(Index<i> &index)
to
double operator()(Index<'i'> &index)
then it compiles fine. But that doesn't give me the
functionality I need.
This may be a duplication of bugs 509, 72, and/or 45,
though they don't seem exactly the same.
>How-To-Repeat:
template<char i>
class Index
{
public:
Index() {};
};
template <class T>
class Tensor1
{
public:
template<char i>
double operator()(Index<i> &index)
{
return 2.0;
}
};
int main()
{
Index<'i'> i;
Tensor1<double> t1;
t1(i);
}
To compile, it's just
g++ simple.C
>Fix:
None known.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: