This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Silly branch compile failure, stage 1
- To: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk
- Subject: Re: Silly branch compile failure, stage 1
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:42:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
>
> The tree seems to be in a bit of a state at the moment. I've not
> tried to bootstrap branch for about a week, so I don't really know how
> long this has been an issue.
>
> gcc -c -DIN_GCC -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -I. -I../../gcc
> -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/config -I../../gcc/../include
> ../../gcc/gengenrtl.c
> In file included from ../../gcc/gengenrtl.c:23:
> ../../gcc/system.h:330: conflicting types for `getrlimit'
> /usr/include/sys/resource.h:52: previous declaration of `getrlimit'
> ../../gcc/system.h:341: conflicting types for `setrlimit'
> /usr/include/sys/resource.h:72: previous declaration of `setrlimit'
>
> x86 Linux.
> Neil.
I don't see this on my x86-linux system through last night.
It looks like configure isn't correctly noticing that you already have
decls for getrlimit & setrlimit. Can you look in config.log and see
why the check for that fails?
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions