This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: merge-with-binutils documentation is wrong/incomplete
On Mar 20, 2001, Markus Werle <markus@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> And - of course - the second option is wrong, too.
> No one ever tested this before. I am really fed up with this bullshit.
> Of course one has to link the stuff in subdirectories like
> ./binutils-2.10.1/include/*
> to the gcc tree, but files differ/conflict, files are already there.
You shouldn't have to. But the preprocessor in development snapshots
and in gcc 2.96 that ships with Red Hat Linux 7 does pathname
canonicalization, which breaks the way these includes used to work.
Indeed, you need to create links in the include tree too, these days :-(
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me