This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Mixed success building gcc-2.95.3.test2
- To: Martin Buchholz <martin at xemacs dot org>
- Subject: Re: Mixed success building gcc-2.95.3.test2
- From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:28:03 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: <bug-gcc at gnu dot org>
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Executive summary: gcc-2.95.3.test2 has a C++ regression on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
>
> >>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Bernd> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> >> Wounded by my previous experiences building with objdir == srcdir, I
> >> tried the recommended objdir != srcdir for subsequent builds.
> >>
> >> Executive summary:
> >> Success on i686-pc-linux-gnu, sparc-sun-solaris2.7, rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.0.0.
> >> Failure on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
>
> Bernd> Please let me know if this is a regression, i.e. whether 2.95.2 works
> Bernd> properly. I think I've had a successful bootstrap on that target, so I
> Bernd> believe there must be something strange about your system, but I'd like
> Bernd> confirmation.
>
> I tried to bootstrap gcc-2.95.2 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 in the same
> way, with objdir != srcdir, and srcdir pristine.
>
> It fails in compare:
>
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> alias.o differs
> alloca.o differs
> bitmap.o differs
> c-aux-info.o differs
> ...
This means it got further than 2.95.3.test2? Are you certain that the 2.95.3
source directory was complete (i.e. no out of disk space condition happened
while untarring)?
Bernd