This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Mixed success building gcc-2.95.3.test2
Executive summary: gcc-2.95.3.test2 has a C++ regression on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schmidt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Bernd> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> Wounded by my previous experiences building with objdir == srcdir, I
>> tried the recommended objdir != srcdir for subsequent builds.
>> Executive summary:
>> Success on i686-pc-linux-gnu, sparc-sun-solaris2.7, rs6000-ibm-aix126.96.36.199.
>> Failure on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
Bernd> Please let me know if this is a regression, i.e. whether 2.95.2 works
Bernd> properly. I think I've had a successful bootstrap on that target, so I
Bernd> believe there must be something strange about your system, but I'd like
I tried to bootstrap gcc-2.95.2 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 in the same
way, with objdir != srcdir, and srcdir pristine.
It fails in compare:
Bootstrap comparison failure!
Which is probably (relatively) harmless due to the usual reasons like
timestamps in object files or something. But of course a bug in 2.95.2.
I see an apparently functional g++ binary.
(martin@hpux) ~cdxw/gcc-2.95.2 $ gcc/g++ --version
I imagine that make install will work, but I don't want to try it.