This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap failure 2.95.3-test2 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>, John Wolfe <jlw at sco dot com>
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure 2.95.3-test2 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis at latnet dot lv>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:52:32 +0200
- Cc: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101191723170.1129-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Friday 19 January 2001 19:24, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, John Wolfe wrote:
> > Andrew Pavenis worte on Fri Jan 19 03:12:57 2001
> >
> > > I saw this in last 2 months when tried to build current CVS version
> > > of gcc-2.95 branch (targets i[56]86-pc-linux-gnu and
> > > i586-pc-msdosdjgpp). I used simply 'cvs update ...' but not the script
> > > contrib/egcs_update (why it's still named so, but not as gcc_update as
> > > in HEAD branch?).
> > >
> > > I think it shouldn't matter if I have all needed tools. The same
> > > approach (simply 'cvs update ...' and after that configuring and 'make
> > > bootstrap') works OK for head branch.
> > >
> > > So I guess something is broken with gcc-2.95 branch.
> > >
> > > As far as I tested gcc-2.95.3-test[12].tar.gz was OK
> >
> > Thanks for the help. I did extract the gcc-2.95.3-test2 with a CVS
> > checkout.
> >
> > I will do a "cvs update" and rebuild.
>
> Try running ./contrib/egcs_update instead of doing "cvs update"
>
Did following tests:
1) unpacked sources from archive I built from CVS tree
2) run contrib/egcs_update --touch
3) configured and sucessfully bootstrapped gcc
4) touched gcc/objc/objc-parse.y and removed libobjc build directory
5) this time simply typed 'make' and got cc1obj crashing when building libobjc
in the same way as mentioned earlier in this thread
Andris