This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro

To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:28:58 -0800
Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20001127124532.H2285@wolery.stanford.edu> <200011272113.VAA10829@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>

> > I don't know what the problem is, but I'll bet you it's the specs
> > reordering -D and -U options.  There is presently no way to ask for
> > "all the -D and -U options, in the same relative order that they
> > appeared on the command line."
> 
> Indeed.   But the order was changed by a checkin you made, but there seems 
> to have been no reason for this change cited.
> 
> What was the reason for changing it?

I don't remember deliberately changing it.  It was probably an
accident.  Feel free to put the order back the way it was.

zw

References:
- Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Fwd: Re: other/823: gcc -U does not undef a macro
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]