This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should people need bison or is that a bug?
- To: Marco dot Franzen at thyron dot com
- Subject: Re: Should people need bison or is that a bug?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 26 Oct 2000 15:09:25 -0200
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <00102616463604.00520@maidavale>
On Oct 26, 2000, Marco Franzen <marcof@thyron.com> wrote:
> According to <http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html#generated_files>, people
> should not need bison.
That's no longer true for CVS check-outs, but it's true for releases.
> Also, the comment header of contrib/gcc_update mentions it as one of
> its main purposes.
It should probably be fixed too.
> (In fact, only gcc/java/parse.h is mentioned.)
It shouldn't.
> This is contradictory. Has the policy changed recently (and the web
> page not been updated) or is this simply a bug?
the former. Would you be kind enough to post a patch to update the
web page and the update script? :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me