This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc numberinv vs egcs numbering
- To: Gregory Hosler <gregory dot hosler at eno dot ericsson dot se>
- Subject: Re: gcc numberinv vs egcs numbering
- From: <llewelly at dbritsch dot dsl dot xmission dot com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:27:49 -0600 (MDT)
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> Is there any document which lists sequentially the version numbers of
> gcc and egcs.
>
> for example, on my Red Hat Linux system, I have egcs 1.1.2
>
> In the "latest" Red Hat development area (a.k.a. "rawhide"), they
> have gcc 2.95.2, 2.95.3, and 2.96-21
>
> I understand the 2.95/2.96 numbering system. I know that back in
> Red Hat 5.2, the gcc version was at 2.7.2.3, and I _think_ that that
> was equivalent to egcs-2.90.29 (but I'm not positive about that).
>
> I am curious as to where egcs 1.1.2 fits in in the sequence of gcc
> numbering.
>
> thank you, and regards,
egcs-1.1.2 == gcc 2.91.66, modulo the temporary gcc/egcs fork (remerged at
2.95)
$gcc -v
will print out full details in any case.