This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: expand_call

On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 07:36:26PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> With C++ included? 

Most definitely.  Everything included.

> Bootstrap compiler was GCC 2.95.2.

That blows one theory.  I caught 20000318 miscompiling libiberty
and causing all sorts of havoc when used as a bootstrap compiler.

FWIW, my bootstrap compiler was stock RH6.1 install egcs 1.1.2.

> BOOT_CFLAGS was -O3 in all cases, but since Michael's report
> was with -O2, I assumed it wouldn't have made much difference.  I may
> try again with -O2 on some of these targets, if it would help.

I'll try once more here with -O3.  If that succeeds, I think I'll
have you either change your bootstrap compiler, or build libiberty
without optimization.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]