This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ BUGS: comma operator


Mark Mitchell wrote:
>   These test-cases are fine, except that new expected-to-fail tests
> should be marked with XFAIL.  The regression test-suite should not
Ok. I installed the tests and took the opportunity to mark some other
recent additions of mine as XFAILs.

Wed Sep  8 09:39:56 BST 1999  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@acm.org>

      * g++.old-deja/g++.other/sizeof3.C: New test.
      * g++.old-deja/g++.other/sizeof4.C: New test.
      * g++.old-deja/g++.other/ambig2.C: Mark XFAILs.
      * g++.old-deja/g++.other/lookup16.C: Mark XFAIL.

nathan

-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: Computer Science Department :: Bristol University
        I have seen the death of PhotoShop -- it is called GIMP
nathan@acm.org  http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/  nathan@cs.bris.ac.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]