This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: "discards qualifiers" is less helpful than "discards const"


>> The new message is less helpful
> 
> But it is correct when the cast is discarding either const, volatile
> or both.

So is a message that simply says "error" and nothing else.  I didn't say the
message was incorrect, only that it is less helpful.

>> Please change this message back to the way it was.
> 
> If you post a patch that determines exactly which qualifiers are being
> discarded and prints them, it would probably be accepted.

I'm requesting that the maintainers of an extremely large and complex piece
of software with which I am totally unfamiliar make a simple change that
will restore it to the state that it was in relatively recently, a state
that any reasonable person would agree is more helpful to users.  As the
principal maintainer of a large and complex piece of free software myself
(Ghostscript), I would consider it unreasonable to expect a random user to
make such a change, and I would not ask a user to do so unless I knew from
extended contact that they were familiar with the code.  Please reconsider
your position.

-- 

L. Peter Deutsch         |       Aladdin Enterprises :::: ghost@aladdin.com
203 Santa Margarita Ave. | tel. +1-650-322-0103 (AM only); fax +1-650-322-1734
Menlo Park, CA 94025     |        http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/index.html


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]