Re: gcc-2.95, new libstdc++ testsuite failures due to libiberty change

["Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>]

 > From: Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com>
 >  
 > >>>>> Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
 >  
 >  > it looks like the shell code in libiberty/Makefile switched from
 >  > building a list of .o files to building a list of function names.
 >  > However the corresponding code in libstdc++/Makefile still expects
 >  > object files.
 >  
 > Oops.  I fixed that logic error in the mainline without sending mail to
 > egcs-patches, and I didn't realize Jeff had applied it to the branch.
 > Propagated.
 > Jason

	Thanks, I'll test it tonight.

BTW, your tweak on both branches not only fixes the logic, but it also
adds mkstemps (which is LGPL'ed) to the NEEDED list.  Doesn't this
break the purpose of the original change, which was to clean out the
LGPL stuff?

Also if it matters, strtol.c and strtoul.c are under the BSD license.
Most of the other files in the NEEDED list are public domain, but some
don't have copyrights or are copyright FSF but don't state
redistribution terms.

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions