This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Results for haifa-enabled egcs-2.93.21 19990502 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) testsuite on sparc-redhat-linux-gnu


On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 01:17:07PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> At 05:20 03.05.99 , craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
> > >Running target unix
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O0
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O1
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O2
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O2 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O2 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -O2 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
> > >FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution,  -Os
> >
> >Could someone debug these?  So far, people have been able to quickly
> >find the problem debugging u77-test.f on their systems (as it's
> >mainly about testing the interface to g77's portable libU77 library)....
> 
> Hmm, I think these might be something strange going on, cause ~2 weeks ago 
> Daniel Jacobowitz checked the mainline on a Debian based PPC system with 
> nearly the same CVS checkout as I did on a Redhat based PPC system. Our 
> systems should be fairly similar, that means a recent binutils 
> (gas-990418), kernel (2.2.x) and glibc (2.1.1pre1).
> At that time I thought this was due to Daniel configuring with 
> --enable-c-cpplib as he did before, but the testsuite output at 
> http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-testresults/1999-04/msg00078.html doesn't 
> show any hint of --enable-c-cpplib. My results are in 
> http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-testresults/1999-04/msg00082.html.
> 
> Daniel, could you rerun your tests with a fresh CVS checkout from today?

Well, my suspicion here would be binutils.  I believe I'm still using
2.9.1.0.19a; I had nowhere near the number of problems with it that you
did.


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|     CMU, CS class of 2002      |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __   Part-Time Systems Programmer  |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |        drow@cs.cmu.edu         |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]