This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap fail related to HOST_WIDEST_INT
- To: richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap fail related to HOST_WIDEST_INT
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at hurl dot cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 05:41:28 -0700
- cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199902241212.MAA19736@sun52.NIS.cambridge>you write:
> > Then you need to debug why.
> >
> > system.h has all the HOST_WIDEST_INT code, it's only a dozen lines or so.
> >
> > Is is possible something has defined HOST_WIDEST_INT before system.h has
> > been included? That's the only way I immediately see for that code
> > to go wrong.
> >
> > jeff
>
> You probably need to ensure HOST_BITS_PER_LONGLONG is defined in the
> relevant host fragment. At least, this was the problem I had on the ARM.
>
Ah. Yea, that could definitely lose. I wonder how many xm files don't
define HOST_BITS_PER_LONGLONG.
I bet this is the problem. Franz, if you could take care of the ppc linux
port I'll make a pass over the rest of the xm files (boy, what fun that'll
be).
jeff