This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-19990103 c++ on Solaris2.6 needs -R/usr/local/lib
- To: manfred at s-direktnet dot de, Manfred dot Hollstein at ks dot sel dot alcatel dot de
- Subject: Re: egcs-19990103 c++ on Solaris2.6 needs -R/usr/local/lib
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:50:31 -0700
- cc: oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br, vonbrand at inf dot utfsm dot cl, egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <13978.12374.896769.696073@sls5gj.stgl.sel.alcatel.de>you write:
> On nil, 11 January 1999, 12:34:07, oliva@dcc.unicamp.br wrote:
>
> > On Jan 11, 1999, Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> wrote:
> >
> > > Where is the format of specs documented, BTW? Couldn't find it in
> > > info.
> >
> > I'm not even sure it is documented somewhere. It probably is, maybe
> > not in the main info file :-(
>
> gcc.c contains pretty informative comments on the various format
> specifiers.
Correct.
"spec" files aren't meant to be hacked by users and are not documented in
user visible places, but are documented internally (gcc.c).
Folks hacking spec files should be very careful. Too much, or not enough
whitespace has been known to kill gcc in the past. If folks find such a case,
we do want to know so that we can fix them.
jeff