This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should axp integers be long int?..was: fmt.c line 95 segfaults
- To: axp-list at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Should axp integers be long int?..was: fmt.c line 95 segfaults
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 98 12:52:01 +0200
- Cc: egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <199803301732.MAA01231@melange.gnu.org><352E796C.2E282D27@bob.usuf2.usuhs.mil>
Bob,
You wrote:
QUOTE
Here are the (different) typedefs for these two versions,
as created by "configure".
egcs-1.0.2
typedef int /* long int */ flag;
typedef int /* long int */ ftnlen;
typedef int /* long int */ ftnint;
egcs-980406
typedef long int /* long int */ flag;
typedef long int /* long int */ ftnlen;
typedef long int /* long int */ ftnint;
UNQUOTE
Indeed, this is a bug. The 1.0.2 system works correctly (I just
checked). I also checked that a freshly cvs'd copy of the main
trunk has the wrong definitions. Could someone please take the blame
for this change :-)
Cheers,
Toon.