This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Final patch for `Re: [971016]: PICFLAG vs. multilib - solution'
On Mon, 16 February 1998, 12:38:25, Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de wrote:
> On Sun, 15 February 1998, 21:25:39, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:
>
> >
> > In message <199802151213.NAA31447@saturn.s-direktnet.de>you write:
> > > Although the ChangeLog entry is there, the patch for Makefile.in is
> > > missing in the current CVS sources.
> > >
> > > Sun Feb 15 13:11:15 1998 Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
> > >
> > > * Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
> > > PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> > > (EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> > Weird. Not sure what happened to it.
> >
> > Please install this change. (Boy it's nice to be able to say that :-)
> >
>
> $ cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in
> cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in
> cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the repository
> cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsBAAa006vv
>
> ??? I thought I'm allowed to write ???
>
Forget about this. Just realized that I was working on my `anoncvs' tree ;-)
Done.
Manfred