fortran archive
date index for April, 2012

This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2012
12:16 Re: Start up routine in Fortran executables Steve Kargl
12:16 Re: Start up routine in Fortran executables Janne Blomqvist
10:56 Re: Executable crashes without error message Edvardsen KÃre
09:49 Start up routine in Fortran executables vikram_sp

April 29, 2012
23:05 调岗调薪及违纪员工处理 请转需求人员
07:14 [patch, fortran, committed] Fix PR 53148 Thomas Koenig

April 27, 2012
18:00 Re: Executable crashes without error message Thomas Koenig

April 26, 2012
06:36 Executable crashes without error message Edvardsen KÃre

April 25, 2012
21:20 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes, take 2 Janne Blomqvist
21:20 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Janne Blomqvist
21:08 [Patch, fortran] PR 52428 Reading of large negative values and range checking Janne Blomqvist
06:15 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - fix actual/formal checks Tobias Burnus

April 24, 2012
19:47 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - fix actual/formal checks Mikael Morin
19:28 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 52196 add -Wrealloc-lhs(-all) Mikael Morin
13:04 Re: [fortran, patch] Allow displaying backtraces from user code Janus Weil
11:19 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Arjen Markus
11:14 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Sylwester Arabas
11:09 Re: either SUBROUTINEs or FUNCTIONs Paul Richard Thomas
11:00 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Arjen Markus
10:49 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Sylwester Arabas
10:24 either SUBROUTINEs or FUNCTIONs Marco van Hulten
09:45 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Arjen Markus
08:54 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Sylwester Arabas
08:47 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Sylwester Arabas
04:40 Re: preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Arjen Markus

April 23, 2012
22:24 preprocessor macro vs. contained function: performance with array-valued arguments Sylwester Arabas

April 22, 2012
16:28 Re: RFC [Patch, Fortran] PR - support "q" for exponents when READing floating-point numbers Janne Blomqvist
15:35 [Fortran-dev] Merge from the trunk Tobias Burnus

April 20, 2012
09:35 Re: RFC [Patch, Fortran] PR - support "q" for exponents when READing floating-point numbers Tobias Burnus
09:18 RFC [Patch, Fortran] PR - support "q" for exponents when READing floating-point numbers Tobias Burnus
09:00 RFA: Odd tree-generation issues with a Fortran patch Tobias Burnus
08:20 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - fix actual/formal checks Tobias Burnus

April 19, 2012
15:18 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Janne Blomqvist
12:03 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 52196 add -Wrealloc-lhs(-all) Tobias Burnus
11:44 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Janne Blomqvist
08:53 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Manfred Schwarb
07:26 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Janne Blomqvist

April 18, 2012
22:46 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Manfred Schwarb
22:19 [Patch, libfortran] Fix handling of temporary files Janne Blomqvist
21:46 [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes, take 2 Janne Blomqvist
20:17 Re: [Fortran] Patch ping Mike Stump
16:58 Re: [Fortran] Patch ping Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
09:07 Re: [Fortran] Patch ping Janne Blomqvist

April 17, 2012
08:59 OT [WAS: Re: Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables?] Anton Shterenlikht
08:38 RE: Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables? N.M. Maclaren
08:24 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Dominique Dhumieres
00:12 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Jerry DeLisle

April 16, 2012
23:31 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Thomas Koenig
23:15 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Tobias Burnus
22:48 Re: [Fortran] Patch ping Tobias Burnus
22:31 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Manfred Schwarb
22:20 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Dominique Dhumieres
22:06 RE: Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables? Craig Dedo
21:32 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Thomas Koenig
20:33 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Dominique Dhumieres
20:10 Re: Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables? N.M. Maclaren
19:07 Re: Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables? Tobias Burnus
18:44 Does GFortran Report Use of Undefined Variables? Craig Dedo
16:32 Re: [Fortran] Patch ping Thomas Koenig
08:52 Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 52968: Call to type-bound procedure wrongly rejected Janus Weil
08:04 [Fortran] Patch ping Tobias Burnus
06:39 Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 52968: Call to type-bound procedure wrongly rejected Tobias Burnus

April 15, 2012
22:02 [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 52968: Call to type-bound procedure wrongly rejected Janus Weil
17:34 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures Tobias Burnus
17:17 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures Dominique Dhumieres
16:51 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures H.J. Lu
15:07 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - Fix pointer-intent regresssion Janus Weil
11:52 [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 51082: [F03] Wrong result for a pointer to a proc-pointer component Janus Weil

April 14, 2012
20:37 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Jerry DeLisle
18:54 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures Thomas Koenig
18:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures Tobias Burnus

April 13, 2012
22:50 Re: [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations Thomas Koenig
20:41 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Janne Blomqvist
20:09 Re: PING Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Mike Stump
17:32 Re: [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations Janne Blomqvist
14:40 Re: PING Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
14:15 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Mike Stump
13:58 [patch, fortran] PR fortran/52537 Optimize string comparisons against empty strings Thomas Koenig
13:58 Re: PING Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Mike Stump
13:21 Re: [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Thomas Koenig
10:51 PING Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
00:38 Re: Problem with calling abstract class procedure from pointer Reuben Budiardja

April 12, 2012
21:40 Re: Problem with calling abstract class procedure from pointer Janus Weil
20:20 Problem with calling abstract class procedure from pointer Reuben Budiardja
17:52 Re: Could the following bug have been detected by a suitable compiler warning. Arjen Markus
17:39 Could the following bug have been detected by a suitable compiler warning. Toon Moene
15:24 [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - fix actual/formal checks Tobias Burnus
08:58 [Patch, Fortran] PR52864 - Fix pointer-intent regresssion Tobias Burnus

April 11, 2012
22:01 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Janus Weil
17:01 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Andrew Benson
12:54 [Patch, Fortran] PR52916 - fix TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 for module procedures Tobias Burnus
12:04 Re: Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Michael Matz
09:55 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Tobias Burnus
09:23 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52729 - fix module-proc decl access for BLOCK/SELECT TYPE Janus Weil
08:58 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Janus Weil
08:28 Re: Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Thomas Koenig
08:27 Re: Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Richard Guenther
08:17 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52729 - fix module-proc decl access for BLOCK/SELECT TYPE Thomas Koenig
08:01 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52729 - fix module-proc decl access for BLOCK/SELECT TYPE Tobias Burnus
07:51 Re: [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations Thomas Koenig

April 10, 2012
20:56 Re: Clarification re. "Variable must not be polymorphic in intrinsic assignment" Janus Weil
16:33 Re: ICE on valid with class array Andrew Benson
15:40 Re: Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Michael Matz
15:16 Re: Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Steven Bosscher
14:53 Guard use of modulo in cshift (speedup protein) Michael Matz
12:32 [patch, fortran] Trim spaces on list-directed reads Thomas Koenig
10:18 Re: forall vs OpenMP N.M. Maclaren
10:14 Re: forall vs OpenMP N.M. Maclaren
10:09 Re: ICE on valid with class array Paul Richard Thomas
08:21 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Tobias Burnus
04:35 ICE on valid with class array Andrew Benson

April 09, 2012
22:47 Clarification re. "Variable must not be polymorphic in intrinsic assignment" Andrew Benson
16:31 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR52909: Procedure pointers not private to modules Janus Weil
11:18 Re: forall vs OpenMP Anton Shterenlikht
10:40 Re: forall vs OpenMP N.M. Maclaren

April 08, 2012
23:16 Re: Procedure pointers not private to modules Andrew Benson
22:34 Re: forall vs OpenMP Tim Prince
22:09 Re: forall vs OpenMP Tim Prince
21:35 Re: Procedure pointers not private to modules Janus Weil
21:24 Re: forall vs OpenMP Anton Shterenlikht
20:29 Re: forall vs OpenMP Tobias Burnus
19:24 Re: forall vs OpenMP Anton Shterenlikht
18:11 Re: forall vs OpenMP Thomas Koenig
16:17 GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - Hotels and registered presentations Diego Novillo
12:52 Re: forall vs OpenMP Anton Shterenlikht
11:35 Re: forall vs OpenMP Tim Prince
11:15 forall vs OpenMP Anton Shterenlikht

April 07, 2012
21:14 Procedure pointers not private to modules Andrew Benson
16:41 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893 Thomas Koenig
08:01 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893 Paul Richard Thomas

April 06, 2012
19:24 [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893 Thomas Koenig

April 05, 2012
08:54 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52668, bogus warning for only list Tobias Burnus
08:26 Re: Runs in 4.4 but not 4.5+ ? Tobias Burnus

April 04, 2012
11:14 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes Janne Blomqvist
09:32 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PRs 52751/40973 - don't set TREE_PUBLIC for PRIVATE module procs/vars Paul Richard Thomas
09:11 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes Tobias Burnus
07:52 Re: [Patch, Fortran]: Fix libgfortran.h error for VMS Tristan Gingold

April 03, 2012
21:18 [Patch, Fortran] PRs 52751/40973 - don't set TREE_PUBLIC for PRIVATE module procs/vars Tobias Burnus
17:53 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes Janne Blomqvist
15:54 Re: [Patch, Fortran]: Fix libgfortran.h error for VMS Tobias Burnus
12:58 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
12:42 [Patch, Fortran]: Fix libgfortran.h error for VMS Tristan Gingold
12:19 [PATCH] gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
12:17 [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
11:59 [Patch, Fortran] PR52729 - fix module-proc decl access for BLOCK/SELECT TYPE Tobias Burnus

April 02, 2012
07:47 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm Tristan Gingold


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3