This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: We should mark "Should Span be Regular? P1085R2" as well.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:38:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: We should mark "Should Span be Regular? P1085R2" as well.
- References: <4a255c9f-995c-abed-98e5-ef5112e6c91a@verizon.net>
On 06/09/19 18:08 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland via libstdc++ wrote:
As the title says.
<span> was (correctly) delivered without comparison ops. so we chould
check off p1085.
Indeed, thanks!
This includes the status updates for constexpr lib diffs posted previously.
I also regenerated the html (resulted in pure boiler except for
manual/status.html).
The boilerplate change are a bit annoying, because next time I regen
the docs with the latest version I'll just flip it all back from
V1.79.1 to Vsnapshot again. That's a lot of noisy churn in the repo
for no benefit. Could you revert your local changes to all the HTML
files except for doc/html/manual/status.html ?
Or just kluge the string back to the current value by running
something like:
find doc/html -name '*.html' | sed -i s/V1.79.1/Vsnapshot/
FWIW the unhelpful "Vsnapshot" string seems to be a bug in the 1.79.2
stylesheets:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/201612/msg00017.html
https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/issues/17
But I've been using V1.79.2 for nearly two years now (since r254078)
so we might as well stick with it now, at least until there's a newer
release of the stylesheets.
If you want to just check in the XML change and leave me to regen the
HTML later this week, that's also fine.