Re: [PATCH] Fix libstdc++ tests requiring atomic support on hppa-hpux

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>]

On 12/03/19 23:01 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > +proc add_options_for_libatomic { flags } {
> > +    if { [istarget hppa*-*-hpux*] } {
> > +       return "$flags -L../../libatomic/.libs -latomic"
> > +    }
>
> It's generally inappropriate to hardcode such ../../libatomic/.libs paths
> without making sure it's for build-tree rather than installed testing (for
> installed testing, -latomic can be found without any -L option and it's
> the board file's responsibility to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH if necessary).

I was going to say something about that, but then saw we already do it
for libgomp/.libs as well. Two wrongs now though ...