This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin? (fwd)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:55:54 +0000
- Subject: Re: Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin? (fwd)
- References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902041927450.27431@stedding.saclay.inria.fr>
On 04/02/19 19:28 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
Forgot gcc-patches@
And I forgot to reply to this one when approving it.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
Reply-To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>,
libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 19:26:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin?
2019-02-04 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
PR libstdc++/87106
* include/bits/stl_uninitialized.h (__is_trivially_relocatable):
Rename...
(__is_bitwise_relocatable): ... to this.
(__relocate_a_1): Adapt.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (__is_trivially_relocatable): Rename...
(__is_bitwise_relocatable): ... to this.
I think it is trivial (pun!) and essentially pre-approved, but it
doesn't hurt to ask.