This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Optimizing C++ Move Functions in Stl



On 2018-12-12 10:24 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12/12/18 17:17 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:14, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > I think there's an attempt to ascertain that mostly constructors and
>>> > assignment operators need noexcept-fixes,
>>> > because that noexcept-ness is directly trait-detectable.
>>> > That would match my current understanding of the situation for at
>>> > least pair and tuple.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes that's true. I was also asking about is there a TODO list for the current release
>>> of gcc 9 as Jonathan mentioned this work is a stage 1 fix or feature and should wait
>>> until gcc 10 stage 1 so was wondering what work is needed in the current stage 3.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion with the previous email and hopefully this makes more sense,
>>
>> We don't have a specific TODO list for gcc 9. For general stuff, we have
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LibstdcxxTodo
>> which is a bit out of date...
> 
> I think he's asking about GCC in general, not just libstdc++. The
> answer is that fixing bugs is appropriate for stage 3, so pick any
> open bugs from Bugzilla.
> 
> 

That's right I was asking about all of gcc. Sorry I thought I CCed the gcc devel
list so no wonder so confused. 

Sorry,

Nick


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]