This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator

From: Daniel Krügler <daniel dot kruegler at gmail dot com>
To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:39:41 +0200
Subject: Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <c199ddfe-3292-f42e-a2ce-aa3ef92e5910@gmail.com> <f8941efc-9020-c64e-f31a-d4ca483f74a3@gmail.com> <20170908161940.GG4582@redhat.com> <45617be7-8df2-3e50-66de-81a71c3d5f62@gmail.com> <CAGNvRgC32HvP9pvZjyQ5v_A7uPb3coZYcin_Lr7RyHNXbsuZNw@mail.gmail.com> <20170911121101.GL4582@redhat.com> <37b937b0-cdff-ca36-b0de-5f8aa11773ab@gmail.com>

2017-09-11 22:36 GMT+02:00 François Dumont <frs.dumont@gmail.com>:
[..]
> So my remark was rather for the:
>
>       _Fwd_list_iterator() noexcept
>       : _M_node() { }
>
> that could simply be
>
>     _Fwd_list_iterator() = default;
>
> no ?

Yes, that should be fine.

- Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: Daniel Krügler
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: std::forward_list optim for always equal allocator
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]