This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Avoid signed overflow in num_get::_M_extract_int (PR libstdc++/67214)


On 18/05/17 19:10 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
This UB has been hiding so long...

Indeed! Thanks for the patch.

2017-03-11  Xi Ruoyao  <ryxi@stu.xidian.edu.cn>

	PR libstdc++/67214
	* include/bits/locale_facets.tcc (_M_extract_int):
	  Add explicit conversion to avoid signed overflow.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc
index 351190c..5f85d15 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc
@@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_LDBL
 	bool __testoverflow = false;
 	const __unsigned_type __max =
 	  (__negative && __gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits<_ValueT>::__is_signed)
-	  ? -__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits<_ValueT>::__min
+	  ? -static_cast<__unsigned_type>(__gnu_cxx::
+	                 __numeric_traits<_ValueT>::__min)

Do we need to keep the negation, or can we just cast to
__unsigned_type?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]