This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Papers comparing SSO and COW strings
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexey Salmin <alexey dot salmin at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 11:24:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: Papers comparing SSO and COW strings
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jwakely at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com AC78623E6EC
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com AC78623E6EC
- References: <CAKt1OCRQeqr_bxu=DTMRqoOVZ3ef1eU2dQ2ejqohp_aXYrvG+A@mail.gmail.com> <20170515154610.GI5109@redhat.com> <CAKt1OCRqP6orsCYM4_GJGNyPibP6Lgq2+cGUj66csM2p03JyOA@mail.gmail.com>
On 15/05/17 19:44 +0300, Alexey Salmin wrote:
True, and I've done some limited local runs on that matter. Though
there's a long way from experiments to published research results and
I hope someone had gone through that already. If not, then probably I
will.
Right, I didn't mean to imply it would be a thorough analysis, sorry.
I'm not aware of anybody publishing such numbers before.