This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: xml/manual/debug_mode.xml reference to Namespace Association
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, François Dumont <fdumont at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 06:28:31 +0000
- Subject: Re: xml/manual/debug_mode.xml reference to Namespace Association
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1703010541170.2487@anthias.pfeifer.com>
On 1 March 2017 at 13:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I found that xml/manual/debug_mode.xml has a reference to the
> following http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html
> in
>
> <para>Achieving link- and run-time coexistence is not a trivial
> implementation task. To achieve this goal we required a small
> extension to the GNU C++ compiler (since incorporated into the C++11
> language specification, described in the GCC Manual for the C++ language as
> <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
> xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html#Namespace-Association">namespace
> association</link>), and a complex organization of debug- and
> release-modes. The end result is that we have achieved per-use
> recompilation but have had to give up some checking of the
> <code>std::basic_string</code> class template (namely, safe
> iterators).
> </para>
>
> That link is broken, and I could not find any suitable replacement
> in the GCC documentation.
>
> Any hints? Suggestions how to go about this? (Perhaps simply omit
> the first half of that sentence?)
Jason deprecated the feature and removed the docs in r244936.
I agree with François's suggestion, but I wouldn't even bother
mentioning anything about previous modes, just say "To achieve this
goal we use inline namespaces and a complex organization ..."