This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville dot voutilainen at gmail dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 14:47:57 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAFk2RUbErzFd3mGZUiBDf1=X3ruEG03_1EvD4CWHFw-y4ctXWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161122133645.GX3145@redhat.com> <CAFk2RUZpF-Ofi-_Oqc=QevWYWb7yOn2ajN_uQQTDy_0cTMMrSg@mail.gmail.com> <20161122150612.GA3145@redhat.com>

On 22 November 2016 at 17:06, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>> so I can certainly change all these swaps to use operator! rather than
>> __not_. Is the
>> patch otherwise ok for trunk? What about the tuple part?
>
>
> Yes, OK changing the top-level __not_s to operator!
> I haven't reviewed the tuple part fully yet.

Updated patches attached, and tested with the full testsuite on Linux-PPC64.

Attachment: lwg2766_2.diff
Description: Text document

Attachment: lwg2766_ugly_2.diff
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [v3 PATCH] LWG 2766, LWG 2749
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]