This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Rainer Emrich <rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:46:30 +0100
Subject: Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <54579773 dot 60601 at emrich-ebersheim dot de> <5457AAF8 dot 5060403 at oracle dot com> <5457C09A dot 60303 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdTxzxQoc+6Ti+6GfgU8X-Mq8xztzFosft2gH96eyCi_aA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141104034118 dot GG3961 at redhat dot com> <20141104043400 dot GJ3961 at redhat dot com> <5458D0F5 dot 5070809 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdQcZbi2kN2X35YsP006b9f38tk8c2XVhLGQeGe4csfJMQ at mail dot gmail dot com>

Hi,

On 11/04/2014 04:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

Not a big deal of course, but unfortunately today I'm seeing *two* segfaults
for pb_ds:

performance/ext/pb_ds/multimap_text_insert_mem_large.cc
.../libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_performance: line 41: 16173 Segmentation
fault      ./$EXE_NAME &>tmp.$FILE_NAME
performance/ext/pb_ds/multimap_text_insert_mem_small.cc
.../libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_performance: line 41: 16217 Segmentation
fault      ./$EXE_NAME &>tmp.$FILE_NAME
They were both caused by the infinite recursion in the operator== for
tracker_allocator, which should be fixed.

To be clear, I see (deterministically, apparently) the three pb_ds failswhich I reported earlier today with a *current* tree. But the pb_dsissues are definitely low priority, unless they point to somethingserious elsewhere. Thanks for looking into that.


Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Rainer Emrich
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: libstdc++ testsuite make targets check-parallel and check-performance don't work anymore
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]