This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: intN patch 3/5: main int128 -> __intN conversion.

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:54:08 +0100
Subject: Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408212030310 dot 16900 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408212123 dot s7LLNPIQ018746 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408212131060 dot 16900 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408220515 dot s7M5Fhpa007479 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408221051550 dot 5292 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408221924 dot s7MJOcjB022631 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408222013390 dot 16713 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408260303 dot s7Q33nqm024601 at greed dot delorie dot com> <20140923190315 dot GQ2669 at redhat dot com> <201409301937 dot s8UJbZWs014574 at greed dot delorie dot com>

On 30/09/14 15:37 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:


Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:

The non-C++/libstdc++ parts are OK with those changes.


Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:

>* libstdc++-v3/
>	* src/c++11/limits.cc: Add support for __intN types.
>	* include/std/type_traits: Likewise.
>	* include/std/limits: Likewise.
>	* include/c_std/cstdlib: Likewise.
>	* include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h: Likewise.
>	* include/c_global/cstdlib: Likewise.

These libstdc++ changes are OK for trunk.


Do I still need approval for gcc/cp/* or do these cover it?


I can't approve gcc/cp/* changes and as Joseph says non-C++ I think
you need to chase someone else (i.e. Jason :-) for that.

References:
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.

Re: intN patch 3/5: main int128 -> __intN conversion.