This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:37:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408212030310 dot 16900 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408212123 dot s7LLNPIQ018746 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408212131060 dot 16900 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408220515 dot s7M5Fhpa007479 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408221051550 dot 5292 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408221924 dot s7MJOcjB022631 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408222013390 dot 16713 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201408260303 dot s7Q33nqm024601 at greed dot delorie dot com> <20140923190315 dot GQ2669 at redhat dot com> <201409291806 dot s8TI69ad011694 at greed dot delorie dot com>
On 29/09/14 14:06 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Just one question about the include/std/limits changes below.
It seems that __glibcxx_signed_b isn't strictly necessary as it
doesn't use the B argument, so is it just there for consistency?
Yup.
OK, thanks for confirming.