This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote: > Thus, are you going to send an actual patch? I'm wondering if we could > arrange it in such a way not to break the binary compatibility in the > release branch (thus fix the bug there too) perhaps by not removing any data > members, simply leaving them unused?! In mainline I suppose we are going to > stabilize the ABI for the 5.0 release, thus we can do that. While we are at > it, check that the order of the final remaining data members is still > optimal size-wise. I've made a patch that changes basic_regex's member only, by making basic_regex::_M_traits heap allocated. I believe that I didn't get it, but I'm still a little bit confused, since we haven't instantiated and exported any regex class (except regex_error, I suppose) to the binary, right? Anyway, the patch is bootstrapped and tested with debug flag. Can it be modified slightly to keep the binary compatibility? Thanks :) -- Regards, Tim Shen
Attachment:
a.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |