This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [patch] No allocation for empty unordered containers
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:05:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] No allocation for empty unordered containers
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140804115539 dot GP2361 at redhat dot com> <53E13810 dot 8030107 at gmail dot com> <20140805201026 dot GH6927 at redhat dot com> <53E13D4B dot 5080909 at oracle dot com> <53EA697F dot 4030407 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 11 dot 1408122137280 dot 1593 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <53EA70B6 dot 20503 at gmail dot com> <20140813095026 dot GU6927 at redhat dot com> <53ED0C8D dot 5020809 at gmail dot com> <540211EF dot 2020206 at gmail dot com>
On 30/08/14 20:03 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Any news for my patch proposals ?
Regarding documentation of default minimum number of buckets, I don't
know where it has been documented but why do we need to document it
separately ? Could it be taken care by Doxygen ? Can't it get the
default value from the code itself ? If not we could document it
ourself next to the code rather than in a distinct file.
It's OK to document it with a Doxygen comment, although I think it
would be better in doc/xml/manual/containers.xml.
I'm reviewing the rest of the patch today, thanks for you patience.