This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Tim Shen <timshen91@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote: >> I'm sure this is because I still don't understand all the regex code, >> but doesn't this change mean that for an "extended" mode regex with >> backrefs, the user could define _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA and >> backrefs wouldn't work? > > Sorry I missed that basic POSIX (BRE) has back-references (damn!), but > extended POSIX (ERE) doesn't. So it should look like: > - if (!__re._M_automaton->_M_has_backref > + if (!(__re._M_automaton->_M_has_backref || (__re._M_flags & > regex_constants::ECMAScript)) > ...and all deleted _M_has_backref lines should be undeleted. > > This patch is a temporary (I'm not sure how long though) workaround; > BFS's support for ECMAScript with no back-references shall be done > finally. Sorry for late; this is the complete patch. Bootstrapped and tested. Thanks! -- Regards, Tim Shen
Attachment:
a.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |