Re: interpreting messages from compiler diags

["Linda A. Walsh" <gcc at tlinx dot org>]

Daniel KrÃgler wrote:
> 2014-06-14 22:52 GMT+02:00 Daniel KrÃgler <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>:
> > 2014-06-14 22:44 GMT+02:00 Linda Walsh <gcc@tlinx.org>:
>
> > The grammar of C++ is defined by the ISO C++ Standard. You can find a
> > recent draft of the standard at this link, for example
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/prot/14882fdis/n3936.pdf
>
> I just notice that this link is not accessible by the public. You
> should be able to try
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3691.pdf
>
> - Daniel
....Thanks for the 2nd link...

Question -- is there an expectation that C++ users will be familiar
with the terminology in the working group standard?

I.e. is it expected that I'd know the terminology in such documents
before I can expect to understand the C++ diagnostics?

Where would be the best place for such questions?