This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 06/06/2014 11:58 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:What's your rationale for keeping this in a separate version block rather than in 1.3.9 (like __int128)?Powerpc already has those symbols in CXXABI_LDBL_1.3 (for a type that isn't __float128 but (de)mangles that way). That doesn't prevent from using CXXABI_1.3.9 in the x86/ia64-specific file though, so I can do that if you prefer. If a new target implements __float128 in 4.11 or 4.12, they will have to refine the configure test and provide a different .ver file to avoid adding symbols to an old version.
Fair enough. Let's stick with your approach then, but drop the 1.3.9 from the name.
Why is __float128 handled as a target type, anyway? I'd think it ought to be a standard type that just isn't supported on all targets, like __int128.
Jason
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |