This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RFC - Another step towards dynarray?

From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
To: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, ruediger at c-plusplus dot de
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:05:24 -0400
Subject: RFC - Another step towards dynarray?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none

Greetings,

I had a start on <dynarray> in my tree and started working on it afterstage 1 opened on gcc-4.10.

After googling around I stumbled on the always_inline attribute anddecided to try it. It seems to work.

Anyway, somehow I had forgotten about the conversations about this thatJonathan and Ruediger had on libstdc++ in the 2013-09 timeframe. So Istopped work so as not to scoop anyone - I'm sorry if I did.

I would like to offer this incomplete patch (the allocator ctors aremessed up, also there's a DR). I think, assuming I really am rightabout [[gny::always_inline]] offering us a way forward. It would be gooto have someone take that solution and merge it into one of our patches(I think Jonathan is ahead on the allocator thing). Or work something out.


I'm putting this up for discussion so I didn't put it to gcc-patches.

Regards,

Ed

Attachment: CL_dynarray
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_dynarray
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC - Another step towards dynarray?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]