Re: [v3 patch] remove PR55043 kluge from unordered containers

[François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>]

On 11/14/2013 01:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Because the unordered containers now have noexcept move constructors
> it is no longer necessary to ensure that is_copy_constructible depends
> on the value_type, so remove that kluge.
>
> 2013-11-14  Jonathan Wakely<jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
>
>         * include/bits/alloc_traits.h (__allow_copy_cons): Remove.
>         (__check_copy_constructible): Likewise.
>         * include/bits/unordered_map.h (unordered_map, unordered_multimap):
>         Do not derive from __check_copy_constructible.
>         * include/bits/unordered_set.h (unordered_set, unordered_multiset):
>         Likewise.
>         * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/55043.cc: It is no longer
>         necessary for is_copy_constructible to be correct to use nested
>         unordered containers.
>         * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/55043.cc: Likewise.
>         * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/55043.cc: Likewise.
>         * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/55043.cc: Likewise.
>
>
> Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
Note that in unordered_set/55043.cc the ::equal functor is missing a '&' 
on its rhs parameter.

Do you want me to fix it ?

François