This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: User-define literals for std::complex.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:26:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: User-define literals for std::complex.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <524506EA dot 1040504 at verizon dot net> <CAH6eHdQro+shBEfavSC3ffRpqZoDJkD4Gu14MBG2ORw4HPFFMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <52644893 dot 8040201 at verizon dot net>
On 20 October 2013 22:18, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 05:39 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 27 September 2013 05:17, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>>>
>>> The complex user-defined literals finally passed (n3779) with the
>>> resolution
>>> to DR1473 allowing the suffix id to touch the quotes (Can't find it but I
>>> put it in not too long ago).
>>
>> I think it's been approved by the LWG and looks like it will go to a
>> vote by the full committee, but let's wait for that to pass before
>> making any changes.
>>
>
> Now that this is in the working paper can we go ahead?
Yes, thanks for waiting. The patch you posted is OK, although I think
"inline constexpr" on the new operators is redundant, as constexpr
functions are implicitly inline.