This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Tim Shen <timshen91 at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:55:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAPrifDmKnBGJnjXH5T-pt=4y84_jXS28=-QUh49OGYitaZ2Xmw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310021218210 dot 2211 at trevally dot site> <524BF842 dot 1090804 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdT3=crTHQg-DJSBUXKs_fkO=xvcPpzMRKLqvRTLEfLm8w at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Minimally, I would talk about "improved support": the evolution from
-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore.

 From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still experimental for now :-)

My understanding was that -std=c++11 changed just because the standard
was published, not because our support was finished.

Note however, that these days we are also triumphally announcing that weare feature complete ;) Morally that kind of announcement seems to mequite inconsistent with saying that the support is experimental. That wehave bugs, that's for sure, but still talking about experimental when wehave a reference released Standard, and we are feature complete, seemsto me a good way to confuse the users... But I don't have a strongopinion here, really. Just say in the announcement what suits yourtaste, try to be minimally consistent and I'm Ok with anything.


Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Tim Shen
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]