This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Bronek Kozicki <brok at spamcop dot net>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:42:04 +0200
Subject: Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <5218F14F dot 9080804 at spamcop dot net> <CAH6eHdTX+Un55-xK6w4Qx-T8s2TT=KjPLYzW23EJFwswAqRuKg at mail dot gmail dot com> <52190267 dot 5010905 at spamcop dot net> <CAH6eHdQOQuWv0tsZPc=6nnLs0duuObtXKNQar_mZjzLR1GoXDQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <52190AD2 dot 9010604 at spamcop dot net> <52190D3B dot 9000201 at spamcop dot net> <5219172C dot 4020409 at spamcop dot net>

Hi,

On 08/24/2013 10:27 PM, Bronek Kozicki wrote:

Here is example naiive implementation with a spinlock pool. Even
though far from perfect, I feel it would be improvement over existing
siutuation, provided large enough pool.

Bronek, you already contributed to the C++ front-end, thus yourCopyright assignment papers are already fine: would you considersubmitting a more finished patch?


Thanks!
Paolo.

References:
- atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Bronek Kozicki
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Bronek Kozicki
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Bronek Kozicki
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Bronek Kozicki
- Re: atomic operations for shared_ptr ?
  - From: Bronek Kozicki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]