This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Recent libstdc++ build failure in hashtable_policy.h on alpha, r201522
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: FranÃois Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 23:46:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: Recent libstdc++ build failure in hashtable_policy.h on alpha, r201522
- References: <CAFULd4a+bs=910OPobMOdoqjEcJD8WeaZoOrA5EgmkSyv0QWbg at mail dot gmail dot com> <5200C300 dot 5090009 at oracle dot com> <52016AE0 dot 3030202 at gmail dot com> <d3f278b7-0335-4887-a93c-d64d9b6c99e7 at email dot android dot com> <5202B8EC dot 304 at gmail dot com>
Hi,
On 08/07/2013 11:15 PM, FranÃois Dumont wrote:
What I don't understand is why when I modify hashtable_policy.h
hashtable_c++0x.cc is not automatically rebuilt when I call make into
<build-folder>/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3. I need to touch
hashtable_c++0x.cc itself to have it rebuilt, wouldn't it be possible
to manage at least direct dependencies ?
Probably it would. When I do quick builds, I *always* do make clean
before make.
Ok.
Thanks,
Paolo.