This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
- From: Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:26 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
- References: <CAFKCwrgRP2K0eqPmbWTyBvOqieCW9ayT1CPh3yXNm9rVnNUw9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdTSg8ipaq6pCwvSVwfee1LAmVAAH=k2+UvFefFhXXQmCA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFKCwriWci5cb8=BVDpcqKQktcWOoitR0aqUV_uLicrYg+BrLw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdQL3knmVgGF5eUHy5d3j0eJ6dYAQ41KOb-Mz7o5UEjSNg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFKCwrghD7r+Pt8sPNV17L9=ZhnVn5Wj7Q_YDaQ9Ehd2y21FNg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdQy+kbtS6EDfz4k4ovcLXd8pCxAHm_Jg+=Z2=71W+jbAg at mail dot gmail dot com>
This must have fallen through the cracks.
I realized we also need it in the 4_7 branch. Could you backport the
change there, too, if it is not too much trouble?
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 12:13, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Forgot to mention it earlier, can this be backported in the 4_8 branch as well?
>
> Yes, I don't see why not. I'll do that too.