This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why no _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB?

From: Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD dot org>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:31:33 +0200
Subject: Re: why no _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB?
References: <510BC554.2070503@FreeBSD.org> <94951131-ff16-465f-8e56-1f6d620dae21@email.android.com>

on 01/02/2013 16:35 Paolo Carlini said the following:
> Hi,
> 
>> I see that that are other, more specialized feature macros like e.g. 
>> _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH. Why not have _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB? I hope that
>> this suggestion makes sense.
> 
> In principle it definitely makes sense. In practice, it's matter of balancing
> the usefulness of it for a target somebody really cares about (among the few
> still not fully supporting C99 in 2013) vs the additional complexity... and
> then actually doing the work, of course (expected to be rather
> straightforward, anyway).

Well, FreeBSD is such a platform and the only thing missing is full C99 complex
support.  I can try to put together the change.

-- 
Andriy Gapon

References:
- why no _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB?
  - From: Andriy Gapon
- Re: why no _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB?
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]