This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>, Pedro Larroy <pedro dot larroy dot lists at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:51:29 +0100
Subject: Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
References: <CAC_CU1hQxVoOsUus5q_sOP8ouVde6QYajSxs7CD85BmGoCxFRg@mail.gmail.com> <50C5E0E2.7060100@oracle.com> <CAC_CU1gGJ32Y_1b-xFyn3Pa96jY6h_XR5nsJ2Aez1+GGa_ZwvA@mail.gmail.com> <50C60EB5.5000800@oracle.com> <CAC_CU1iDJa2jg-sqLUBOrhKkBXiifHk5udgKy1iKMzwjzYo8Tw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1212101744200.3779@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>

On 12/10/2012 05:47 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:

If anything, it could be removed from the non-debug mode. If you want to call == on the base type, then cast the arguments to the base type and just call ==

Right, I don't see why not, the implementation would be a tad simpler and still conforming, and no worse (AFAICS) from the QoI point of view. Let's remember to do that for 4.9...

Thanks!
Paolo.

References:
- operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Pedro Larroy
- Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Pedro Larroy
- Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Pedro Larroy
- Re: operator== missing on std::__debug::map<>::iterator
  - From: Marc Glisse

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]