This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Rice distribution
On 09/06/2012 05:06 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 09/06/2012 12:34 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
What do you guys think?
Great idea. But let's make sure everything is consistent and up to
date, as Ulrich also noticed, both in terms of code and testcases.
Also, well, we still have to make the final decision whether we want
__rice_distribution or rice_distribution. You see, Ed, your nice offer
made me think that in fact it's not *obvious* *which* additional
distributions will be standardized at the next occasion... that seems
a further argument in favor of just going with the double underscore
in front, for now. In case, adding "unuglified" typedefs will be
trivial...
Paolo.
I think we should double underscore beta and the multivariate normal and
all the ext components just to be safe. I am certain that beta would be
added as standard - the library needs at least one bathtub
distribution. But we could just call the uglified one when this happens.